<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dawkins&#8217; Ten Commandments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sacredriver.org/582/dawkins-ten-commandments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sacredriver.org/582/dawkins-ten-commandments</link>
	<description>Exploring a nontheistic spirituality grounded in naturalism and humanism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 15:50:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ash</title>
		<link>http://www.sacredriver.org/582/dawkins-ten-commandments#comment-1043</link>
		<dc:creator>Ash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 May 2010 12:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sacredriver.org/?p=582#comment-1043</guid>
		<description>Kyle, don&#039;t worry about it. I&#039;m not sure I could have written what you did when I was 15. We are talking about things that are not easily described in conversational english. Just keep on writing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kyle, don&#8217;t worry about it. I&#8217;m not sure I could have written what you did when I was 15. We are talking about things that are not easily described in conversational english. Just keep on writing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://www.sacredriver.org/582/dawkins-ten-commandments#comment-1042</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 May 2010 04:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sacredriver.org/?p=582#comment-1042</guid>
		<description>Ash, now that I&#039;m reading what I wrote, I can see how I lost you. I thank you for replying to my post, that was very helpful. Next time I post something I&#039;ll make sure to try and make it more easily understood. &quot;While there are certainly objective truths in the world, how we approach them can radically change our perception and experience of those truths,&quot; I was trying to say something more along those lines than what I actually wrote but could not think of a way to put it into words.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ash, now that I&#8217;m reading what I wrote, I can see how I lost you. I thank you for replying to my post, that was very helpful. Next time I post something I&#8217;ll make sure to try and make it more easily understood. &#8220;While there are certainly objective truths in the world, how we approach them can radically change our perception and experience of those truths,&#8221; I was trying to say something more along those lines than what I actually wrote but could not think of a way to put it into words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ash</title>
		<link>http://www.sacredriver.org/582/dawkins-ten-commandments#comment-1037</link>
		<dc:creator>Ash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 12:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sacredriver.org/?p=582#comment-1037</guid>
		<description>Hi Kyle, thanks for your comment. So, if I&#039;m reading you accurately, you are saying that after many years of religiousness, you discovered that the Bible is not necessary for goodness. When you read stories in the Bible, you aren&#039;t worried about the historical veracity, you are thinking about the lessons they can impart to you. But then you lost me....

I certainly agree that I could be &quot;doing a better job...&quot;, but I&#039;m not sure what job it is to which you are referring. Please expand on this. 

You say you aren&#039;t changing. Ok, you should just be yourself. And you don&#039;t think I should change. Ok, I&#039;ll just try to be myself, too. But what kind of change were you talking about?

Finally, I agree that questioning what we know can lead to new knowledge and insight. But I&#039;m not sure I agree that once a truth is found nothing will change &quot;the results.&quot; Very often truth is more complex and multifaceted than initial findings indicate. Further, while there are certainly objective truths in the world, how we approach them can radically change our perception and experience of those truths. Just food for thought there. 

Kyle, you just keep on thinking and questioning and learning. Pretty good for a fifteen year old so far :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kyle, thanks for your comment. So, if I&#8217;m reading you accurately, you are saying that after many years of religiousness, you discovered that the Bible is not necessary for goodness. When you read stories in the Bible, you aren&#8217;t worried about the historical veracity, you are thinking about the lessons they can impart to you. But then you lost me&#8230;.</p>
<p>I certainly agree that I could be &#8220;doing a better job&#8230;&#8221;, but I&#8217;m not sure what job it is to which you are referring. Please expand on this. </p>
<p>You say you aren&#8217;t changing. Ok, you should just be yourself. And you don&#8217;t think I should change. Ok, I&#8217;ll just try to be myself, too. But what kind of change were you talking about?</p>
<p>Finally, I agree that questioning what we know can lead to new knowledge and insight. But I&#8217;m not sure I agree that once a truth is found nothing will change &#8220;the results.&#8221; Very often truth is more complex and multifaceted than initial findings indicate. Further, while there are certainly objective truths in the world, how we approach them can radically change our perception and experience of those truths. Just food for thought there. </p>
<p>Kyle, you just keep on thinking and questioning and learning. Pretty good for a fifteen year old so far <img src='http://www.sacredriver.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://www.sacredriver.org/582/dawkins-ten-commandments#comment-1033</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 03:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sacredriver.org/?p=582#comment-1033</guid>
		<description>This is why i love StumbleUpon, and Ash, you are my hero.

Now for my actual comment. I may only be 15 but for 8 of those years (not including when i was a small child) I was an extremely religious person. I went to church every Sunday, went to catechism every Tuesday, and actively participated in every aspect of my church, it was only until I began reading INTO the Bible that I realized what I really believed. I believed that I didn&#039;t NEED the Bible to know what was right, that NOBODY should need the Bible to decide that. I read it and I thought about this for many years. In fact, I think about it everyday, and it isn&#039;t because I DOUBTED my religion, its because i listened to it, and I payed attention to it. When people read a book, they want to know what happens to the characters, not me, I search for messages, depth, understanding, experiences, feelings, interaction when i read. The characters in books aren&#039;t telling us their stories merely for the sake of entertainment, they want us to get something out of it. I could go on and on about this, but i don&#039;t find it necessary. And I want this to be clarified, I respect you for doing what is right, but I also want you to know that you can do a much better job at it. No, I&#039;m not saying you should change, but I&#039;m letting you know, I&#039;m not. When  you question what you already know, you find truth, when you find truth, you will question it, but it isn&#039;t going to change the results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is why i love StumbleUpon, and Ash, you are my hero.</p>
<p>Now for my actual comment. I may only be 15 but for 8 of those years (not including when i was a small child) I was an extremely religious person. I went to church every Sunday, went to catechism every Tuesday, and actively participated in every aspect of my church, it was only until I began reading INTO the Bible that I realized what I really believed. I believed that I didn&#8217;t NEED the Bible to know what was right, that NOBODY should need the Bible to decide that. I read it and I thought about this for many years. In fact, I think about it everyday, and it isn&#8217;t because I DOUBTED my religion, its because i listened to it, and I payed attention to it. When people read a book, they want to know what happens to the characters, not me, I search for messages, depth, understanding, experiences, feelings, interaction when i read. The characters in books aren&#8217;t telling us their stories merely for the sake of entertainment, they want us to get something out of it. I could go on and on about this, but i don&#8217;t find it necessary. And I want this to be clarified, I respect you for doing what is right, but I also want you to know that you can do a much better job at it. No, I&#8217;m not saying you should change, but I&#8217;m letting you know, I&#8217;m not. When  you question what you already know, you find truth, when you find truth, you will question it, but it isn&#8217;t going to change the results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenna S</title>
		<link>http://www.sacredriver.org/582/dawkins-ten-commandments#comment-1014</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenna S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 01:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sacredriver.org/?p=582#comment-1014</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s address Morris&#039; REAL action. He is using a verse from a book filled with violence, lies, fairytales, misogyny, incest, genocide, rape and other various and sundry atrocities to call a wise, gentle, decent, logical, learned man a fool.

Yeah, that is one ringing indictment right there. 

If Dawkins is a fool, we should all strive to be so foolish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s address Morris&#8217; REAL action. He is using a verse from a book filled with violence, lies, fairytales, misogyny, incest, genocide, rape and other various and sundry atrocities to call a wise, gentle, decent, logical, learned man a fool.</p>
<p>Yeah, that is one ringing indictment right there. </p>
<p>If Dawkins is a fool, we should all strive to be so foolish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erica</title>
		<link>http://www.sacredriver.org/582/dawkins-ten-commandments#comment-921</link>
		<dc:creator>Erica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sacredriver.org/?p=582#comment-921</guid>
		<description>Careful, the &quot;modern iteration&quot; of Islam, as you call it, seems to be the extremist Shi&#039;ite (or Shiah, for the historians) sect that has emerged during this century. Do remember that this came about after centuries of roiling turmoil brought about by a mere difference of opinion that came up in the fifth century AD. Be careful not to &#039;lump in&#039; all Muslim peoples with those for whom we traditionally have a distaste. 

While I do agree that the Shariah code has inevitably given the Middle Eastern Muslims a bad name, we must remember that there are people of every faith (including Islam) who are level-headed people and who do not obsessively proselytize.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Careful, the &#8220;modern iteration&#8221; of Islam, as you call it, seems to be the extremist Shi&#8217;ite (or Shiah, for the historians) sect that has emerged during this century. Do remember that this came about after centuries of roiling turmoil brought about by a mere difference of opinion that came up in the fifth century AD. Be careful not to &#8216;lump in&#8217; all Muslim peoples with those for whom we traditionally have a distaste. </p>
<p>While I do agree that the Shariah code has inevitably given the Middle Eastern Muslims a bad name, we must remember that there are people of every faith (including Islam) who are level-headed people and who do not obsessively proselytize.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PETER</title>
		<link>http://www.sacredriver.org/582/dawkins-ten-commandments#comment-872</link>
		<dc:creator>PETER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 19:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sacredriver.org/?p=582#comment-872</guid>
		<description>I am amazed that the word of god is open to interpretation,if it is truly the word of God wouldn&#039;t the message be clear and straight forward. But since the big three have so many different interpretations it is clear that it was written by man. God can make the heavens and the Earth but can&#039;t get the message out without it getting misinterpreted. Interesting, God can&#039;t communicate properly, what if God messed the instructions on making the universe because he misread them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am amazed that the word of god is open to interpretation,if it is truly the word of God wouldn&#8217;t the message be clear and straight forward. But since the big three have so many different interpretations it is clear that it was written by man. God can make the heavens and the Earth but can&#8217;t get the message out without it getting misinterpreted. Interesting, God can&#8217;t communicate properly, what if God messed the instructions on making the universe because he misread them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaird</title>
		<link>http://www.sacredriver.org/582/dawkins-ten-commandments#comment-775</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 08:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sacredriver.org/?p=582#comment-775</guid>
		<description>English isn&#039;t the original, the Bible was originally written in Hebrew and was translated away from it through Greek to Latin to English, so the closer you get to Hebrew the more accurate it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>English isn&#8217;t the original, the Bible was originally written in Hebrew and was translated away from it through Greek to Latin to English, so the closer you get to Hebrew the more accurate it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sreekanth</title>
		<link>http://www.sacredriver.org/582/dawkins-ten-commandments#comment-772</link>
		<dc:creator>sreekanth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 14:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sacredriver.org/?p=582#comment-772</guid>
		<description>aha! you are going to be really popular in heaven.keep up the good work.i recommend that you read the bhagavad gita:)for intellectual purposes only;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>aha! you are going to be really popular in heaven.keep up the good work.i recommend that you read the bhagavad gita:)for intellectual purposes only;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deniz Eda &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Epic Comment Win</title>
		<link>http://www.sacredriver.org/582/dawkins-ten-commandments#comment-725</link>
		<dc:creator>Deniz Eda &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Epic Comment Win</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 19:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sacredriver.org/?p=582#comment-725</guid>
		<description>[...] and is bad for any human being&#8217;s health. But today, tonight, StumbleUpon brought me a website, where out of boredom I scrolled down to the comments and read one of the most awesome comments [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and is bad for any human being&#8217;s health. But today, tonight, StumbleUpon brought me a website, where out of boredom I scrolled down to the comments and read one of the most awesome comments [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
